Withholding information from a Surety company when trying to get bonding support is a sure way to get yourself in trouble. In this technological age we live in, information, however seemingly obscure, is readily accessible at the click of a mouse. Let this example I recently encountered be a warning:
A construction company was looking for support for a $17 million dollar bond, a bond almost twice as large as their previous largest completed job. Our presentation had to be perfect, and we believed it was;
- Bank line, check
- Adequate working capital, check
- Detailed job breakdown, check
- Bonding back of key subcontractors, check
- Owner was one that they have worked for previously with stellar recommendations
In addition, the contractor agreed to use funds control on the project, which added an extra layer of security to the Surety. We presented our case, and fully expected the bond to get approved. It did not… here’s why;
The Surety company, in their due diligence, found out that one of the owners had his brother on the payroll on the job that was to be bonded. It turns out the brother used to have his own construction company… and got de-barred for not paying prevailing wages on a state job. So now, the Surety company believed that the company may be a front for the brother, who can’t get jobs under his own name. Whether or not it was true was irrelevant… the trust was gone, and so was their chance to get the bond.
In our own interview process, we asked the owner about his brother, and why he was not an owner of the company as well… to which he told us that “he doesn’t want the aggravation”. We took him at his word. The Surety company googled the brother’s name, and found out what they found out. Instead of letting us know the full story, and spin it in a positive light… the bonding company found it out themselves and assumed the worst. What could we have done had we known this information before the bonding company did?
- He could have told the bonding company about the brother’s prior issues. The owner, learned a great deal from the mistakes that his brother made, has seen the devastation it caused to the business, and is committed to doing everything the right way. In addition, here are the following oversight precautions being taken in order to ensure the same situation never happens again, etc.
See the difference between the two scenarios? Same situation, but different results if only we would have prepared. The biggest threat to not getting bonding support, is not telling the whole truth. Once you get caught, you are toast. The bonding community is small, and underwriters talk. Find an agent you trust, and lay your cards on the table. The only obstacle a good agent can’t overcome is the one he doesn’t know about.